I herein conclude considering Clifton A. Emahiser’s Special Notice To All Who Deny Two Seedline, #6 (he has written a couple dozen of these). Note that I previously wrote Clifton A. Emahiser’s “Two Seedline” racismpart 1 and part 2.
Clifton A. Emahiser
Emahiser specifically takes issue with Jack Mohr’s (see part 1) denial that the word fruit, from Genesis 3, does not have allow for “any sexual interpretation…unless your mind is sexually oriented…Certainly the SEEDLINERS SEE SEX IN THIS PASSAGE. Shows you where their mind is, doesn’t it?”
This gets into the issue of the fact that in any language a word can mean more than one thing. Emahiser points out that as per Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon the term fruit includes a definition of offspring. Indeed, but how does this help Emahiser? Is he changing gears and claiming that Eve had sex with offspring (of who or what) since she partook of fruit?
We actually get a window in to Emahiser study methodology when he writes, “I were to use key words in the Old Testament and run them in the search mode of my copy of the Talmud on CD-R in my computer, no doubt, I could come up with at least 500 examples of truth contained within these writings.” Well, key words are only correlated by spelling but are isolated as per context. You simply cannot look at words in different texts and conclude that the text refer to the same subjects because the same words are employed. The manner whereby to determine meaning is context, context, context. The point is that cherry picking and choosing definitions does not determine meaning but context does.
For those who are interested, I dealt with the terms tree, fruit, eat, etc. within the article
Disambiguating the serpent seedline of Satan theory in Genesis 3, part 1.
Interestingly enough, Emahiser pokes fun at Mohr since Mohr “believes that the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil were wooden trees; that the serpent was an ordinary snake and the fruit was simply some kind of fruit from some fruit tree. Thus, Jack Mohr, in implying this, makes the tree of life (the Messiah) a wooden tree.”
In other words, Emahiser believes that the tree of life was not a wooden tree but was Jesus the Messiah. Now, he also believes that references to Eve eating of the fruit of the forbidden tree was a sexual act since the tree is really Satan (and, apparently, the serpent is also Satan). Of course, this also means that Adam had sex with Satan as he too partook. Yet, moreover, as per Genesis 2 Adam and Eve also had sex with Jesus and many others since they were allowed to eat of the fruit of every tree in the garden except for one.
Oddly, Clifton A. Emahiser besmirches Jack Mohr as “he does not appear to be of pure Israelite stock” which means White Aryan. He also takes issue with Mohr who “points a finger at James E. Wise” and while “It seems it is quite all right for the anti-seedliners to name names” he informs us that “it is anathema for the Two Seedliners.”
So Emahiser points a finger at Mohr and thus name names and then condemns Mohr for pointing fingers and naming names—go figure. It is also fascinating that “it is anathema for the Two Seedliners” to name names (which means that Emahiser is anathematized) as this proves how unbiblical they are, the Bible teaches:
But if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again, if anyone preaches any other gospel to you than what you have received, let him be accursed (Galatians 1:8-9).
Now I urge you, brethren, note those who cause divisions and offenses, contrary to the doctrine which you learned, and avoid them (Romans 16:17).
And their messages will spread like cancer. Hymenaus and Philetus are of this sort (2nd Timothy 2:17).
Alexander the coppersmith did me much harm. May the Lord repay him according to his works (2nd Timothy 4:14).
I wrote to you in my epistle no to keep company with sexually immoral people. Yet I certainly did not mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; not even to eat with such a person. For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? But those who are outside God judges. Therefore put away from yourselves the evil person (1st Corinthians 5:9-13).
Clifton A. Emahiser then references 2 Corinthians 11:3 which states:
But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
He focuses on the term “beguiled” and notes, “The Thayer Greek-English Lexicon takes us to an unusual scripture on the Greek word 1818 in the Apocrypha, History of Susanna, v. 56 which reads: ‘So he put him aside and commanded to bring the other, and said unto him, O thou seed of Chanaan [Canaan], and not of Juda, beauty hath deceived [#1818 beguiled] thee, and lust hath perverted thine heart.’ [Note #1818: Same as for Eve.]”
He then elucidates that the tale is about “a woman of great beauty who lived with her wealthy husband Joakin…where Susanna strolled and bathed herself…two Canaanite-Jew elders inflamed with desire for Susanna plotted among themselves to force her affections…Susanna chose to be unjustly accused rather than submit…these Canaanite-Jews gave their false testimony” but “Their contradictory answers” to the court “betrayed their treachery,” etc.
Again and again and again when I write about the serpent seed of Satan theory I have to emphasize that words have more than one meaning and in this case we can see how the New Testament’s greater context employs the term exapataō. Let us see if it has any sexual connotations:
Romans 7:11, “For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, exapataō [sexual connotations] me, and by it slew me.
Romans 16:18, “For they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus Christ, but their own belly; and by good words and fair speeches exapataō [sexual connotations] the hearts of the simple.”
1 Corinthians 3:18, “Exapataō [sexual connotations] no man exapataō [sexual connotations] himself. If any man among you seemeth to be wise in this world, let him become a fool, that he may be wise.”
2 Corinthians 11:3, “But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent exapataō [sexual connotations] Eve through his subtilty, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.”
2 Thessalonians 2:3, “Exapataō [sexual connotations] no man exapataō [sexual connotations] you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition;”
Romans 16:18 refers to words and speeches that are used to exapataō the hearts.
1 Corinthians 3:18 has references to exapataō followed by a reference to wisdom and foolishness.
2 Thessalonians 2:3 has exapataō in reference to falling away and with v. 2 referring to being “shaken in mind” being “troubled, neither by spirit, nor by word, nor by letter as from us.”
Thus, 2 Corinthians 11:3 as nothing to do with sexual connotations since Eve knew that God had stated, “Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die” but the manner in which Satan exapataō her was to tell her “Ye shall not surely die” and if the greater context is not enough for you then consider the immediate context which is that “so your minds” minds and not bodies, “should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.” It was obviously a reference to Satan’s deception both in Genesis and 2 Corinthians.
Thus, overall Clifton A. Emahiser put on a clinic as to how one can concoct false teaching via illogic, key word searches, conveniently quoting texts partially, etc., etc., etc.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A plea: I have to pay for server usage and have made all content on this website free and always will. I support my family on one income and do research, writing, videos, etc. as a hobby. If you can even spare $1.00 as a donation, please do so: it may not seem like much but if each person reading this would do so, even every now and then, it would add up and really, really help. Here is my donate/paypal page.
Due to robo-spaming, I had to close the comment sections. However, you can comment on my Facebook page and/or on my Google+ page.
Twitter: #Seedlines, #Racism, #CliftonEmahiser
Facebook: #Seedlines, #Racism, #CliftonEmahiser